<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Guidelines Spy vs Google Webmaster Central Spy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seoish.com/google-guidelines-spy-vs-google-webmaster-central-spy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seoish.com/google-guidelines-spy-vs-google-webmaster-central-spy/</link>
	<description>Widget strategy, Google gadgets, iGoogle, and the shifting sands of SEO.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 20:38:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matt Inertia</title>
		<link>http://www.seoish.com/google-guidelines-spy-vs-google-webmaster-central-spy/comment-page-1/#comment-7445</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Inertia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 17:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoish.com/?p=1025#comment-7445</guid>
		<description>Good spot! I hope someone at G HQ is getting a spanking for that one! I hate the way G has us jumping through hoops in an attempt to improve their own business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good spot! I hope someone at G HQ is getting a spanking for that one! I hate the way G has us jumping through hoops in an attempt to improve their own business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Temple</title>
		<link>http://www.seoish.com/google-guidelines-spy-vs-google-webmaster-central-spy/comment-page-1/#comment-7250</link>
		<dc:creator>David Temple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 03:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoish.com/?p=1025#comment-7250</guid>
		<description>Nicely done, I love Spy vs. Spy. 

As for contradiction number one, I would add from the blog &quot;However, as a matter of fact, we at Google have made some progress in both areas.&quot;. Notice the &quot;some progress&quot;, which adds to the confusion. 

Could this all just be a matter of the guidelines won&#039;t change until that &quot;some progress&quot; is complete? Also it seems Google is saying webmasters are botching the rewrites so don&#039;t do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nicely done, I love Spy vs. Spy. </p>
<p>As for contradiction number one, I would add from the blog &#8220;However, as a matter of fact, we at Google have made some progress in both areas.&#8221;. Notice the &#8220;some progress&#8221;, which adds to the confusion. </p>
<p>Could this all just be a matter of the guidelines won&#8217;t change until that &#8220;some progress&#8221; is complete? Also it seems Google is saying webmasters are botching the rewrites so don&#8217;t do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhea</title>
		<link>http://www.seoish.com/google-guidelines-spy-vs-google-webmaster-central-spy/comment-page-1/#comment-7245</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 03:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoish.com/?p=1025#comment-7245</guid>
		<description>Nice simple outline of the contradictions. No personal agenda, just to the point display of what they are now saying and have said on the issue.

I don&#039;t think the third contradiction is apples to apples, but it isn&#039;t worth arguing over.

The most disconcerting point for me came from the second contradiction where Google stated, &quot;Providing search engines with dynamic URLs should be favored over hiding parameters to make them look static.&quot; The use of &quot;hiding&quot; in reference to URL rewriting implies some nefarious act when the end result benefits users and presumably prior to this post, search engines themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice simple outline of the contradictions. No personal agenda, just to the point display of what they are now saying and have said on the issue.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think the third contradiction is apples to apples, but it isn&#8217;t worth arguing over.</p>
<p>The most disconcerting point for me came from the second contradiction where Google stated, &#8220;Providing search engines with dynamic URLs should be favored over hiding parameters to make them look static.&#8221; The use of &#8220;hiding&#8221; in reference to URL rewriting implies some nefarious act when the end result benefits users and presumably prior to this post, search engines themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SearchCap: The Day In Search, September 25, 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.seoish.com/google-guidelines-spy-vs-google-webmaster-central-spy/comment-page-1/#comment-7237</link>
		<dc:creator>SearchCap: The Day In Search, September 25, 2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 21:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seoish.com/?p=1025#comment-7237</guid>
		<description>[...] Google Guidelines Spy vs Google Webmaster Central Spy, SEOish [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google Guidelines Spy vs Google Webmaster Central Spy, SEOish [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
